Nick Korte


Recent Posts by Nick

2019 Compensatory Draft Picks Update (5/8/2018)

With the league offices closing for today, the second Tuesday after the 2017 NFL Draft, it also closes out the addition of compensatory free agents (CFAs) into the formula for the 2018 NFL Draft. With only CFA subtractions now possible due to cuts or too low of a salary, it’s time to take a look at the list that’s emerged.

There is a bit of the changing of the guard in the teams seen in this year’s list. A few stalwarts like New England, Baltimore and Cincinnati remain prominent, but others like Green Bay, Denver, Seattle, and Pittsburgh are starkly missing. In their place are some teams with notable circumstances within 2018 free agency: the Los Angeles Rams (who like New England are on track to get two 3rd round comp picks), Minnesota (who saw three quarterbacks leave in free agency), Philadelphia (a major sleeper on pursuing comp picks, as I’ll explain below) and Washington (who, despite their hard earned reputation of being big time UFA spenders, are poised to break the longest active regular comp pick drought. The last time they got one was 2009, a 7th rounder that was used to draft Marko Mitchell.)

Also notable is that this could be the first year under the current CBA that getting a seven figure APY is required to qualify for the compensatory formula. Currently, Geno Smith, at $1 million even, is on the bubble of qualifying, and with him out of consideration (as is likely unless something disastrous happens to the durable Philip Rivers) it opens up a 7th rounder to the Chargers for either Kenny Wiggins or Matt Slauson, and also takes off the board a 4th rounder to the Giants for either Weston Richburg or Justin Pugh.

Notable cases

There are two players that, despite being listed as Unrestricted Free Agents in the official press release, I am guessing will not qualify for the compensatory formula. They are Donald Stephenson, going from Denver to Cleveland, and Derrick Johnson, going from Kansas City to Oakland. This is because both Stephenson and Johnson had their contracts shortened by renegotiating voids in their 2018 year in exchange for taking pay pay cuts in 2017. This is unfortunate for both the Broncos and Chiefs, as it will negatively impact their comp pick ledgers. For Denver, if Stephenson counted it would open up a 7th rounder for Corey Nelson (although he would be unlikely to make the 32-pick limit). Otherwise, it will end the Broncos’ four year streak of obtaining or being eligible compensatory picks–unless Brock Osweiler somehow becomes the Dolphins’ starting quarterback for most to all of 2018. The Chiefs, however, are projected to get a 6th or 7th rounder for Terrence Mitchell as of now, but if Johnson qualified they would likely get another 6th or 7th rounder for him as well.

The other unusual case involves Mike Wallace, going from Baltimore to Philadelphia. As I mentioned above, the Eagles are a team that have been largely ignored in recent comp pick studies, but historically this is mistaken to do so. From 2004 to 2011, the Eagles got multiple comp picks in six of those eight drafts, and were second only to Baltimore in the most total comp picks awarded. Howie Roseman was a high level executive with the team during those times, and looking at how he’s crafted some of his CFA signings, there are signs that he just as determined as Ozzie Newsome, Bill Belichick, or John Elway in manipulating the comp pick system.

This brings us back to Wallace. Early reports had his Eagles’ deal as one year and “up to” $4 million. However, it was soon discovered that there was plenty of funny money in that deal. $2.085 million of that $4 million are in Likely To Be Earned incentives, and among the most laughable was a $585,000 weight bonus to be earned by reporting to offseason workouts under 250 pounds. It’s laughable because Wallace, a wide receiver, has consistently played at a relatively svelte 200 pounds. But the comp pick formula shines insight on this unusual bonus, as it’s established that weight bonuses do not count. (See Terrance Knighton demoting a comp pick for Denver in 2016.)

But it doesn’t end there. Wallace’s $1 million signing bonus is actually an OATSB–Other Amount Treated As Signing Bonus. OTC also believes that this OATSB is a guaranteed workout bonus. Although it’s unclear how the comp pick formula will judge such a payment, it has been very consistent in not counting workout bonuses of any kind. Because there are many signs suggesting that the Eagles are manipulating the formula with Wallace’s contract, I’m therefore guessing that this $1 million will not count either. If that guess is correct, all that’s left to count is Wallace’s veteran minimum base salary of $915,000, and while he could still qualify if he plays enough snaps, currently that’s not enough to break the current qualification limit of $1 million.

The end result? If Wallace does not qualify, as I have it so right now, it opens up an additional 6th rounder to Philadelphia for Patrick Robinson, and it potentially costs Baltimore a 7th for Wallace.

TeamRoundCompensated Free AgentAPY
WAS3Kirk Cousins$28,000,000
MIN3Case Keenum$18,000,000
LAR3Sammy Watkins$15,830,000
NE3Nate Solder$15,400,000
LAR3Trumaine Johnson$14,500,000
CAR3Andrew Norwell$13,000,000
NE3Malcolm Butler$12,170,000
BAL4Ryan Jensen$10,500,000
IND4Donte Moncrief$9,600,000
DAL4Anthony Hitchens$8,838,000
ATL4Dontari Poe$8,533,333
PHI4Trey Burton$7,925,000
WAS5Spencer Long$6,850,000
ATL5Taylor Gabriel$6,500,000
DET5D.J. Hayden$6,333,333
MIN6Teddy Bridgewater$5,500,000
WAS6Ryan Grant$5,000,000
PHI6Beau Allen$5,000,000
NE6Dion Lewis$4,950,000
PHI6Patrick Robinson$4,925,000
WAS6Terrelle Pryor$4,500,000
CIN6Andre Smith$4,000,000
CIN6AJ McCarron$3,950,000
CIN6Chris Smith$3,900,000
CAR6Ed Dickson$3,566,667
KC6Terrance Mitchell$3,233,333
MIN7Tramaine Brock$3,000,000
ARI7Jaron Brown$2,750,000
NE7Cameron Fleming$2,500,000
LAC7Kenny Wiggins$2,500,000
LAR7Cody Davis$2,500,000
MIN7Shamar Stephen$2,100,000
Compensation over 32-pick limit; not awarded
ARI7Blaine Gabbert$2,000,000
ARI7Matt Barkley$1,400,000
LAR7Derek Carrier$1,275,000
ARI7Earl Watford$1,250,000
SF7Tank Carradine$1,150,000
IND7Frank Gore$1,105,000
SF7Leon Hall$1,060,000
SF7Logan Paulsen$1,005,000

Names to watch in training camp

For the next few months, the most important thing to watch for with regard to 2019 compensatory picks is if any CFAs fail to make and stay on their team’s roster. If any CFA is permanently cut from their team’s roster before Week 10, they will not qualify for the compensatory formula. Using a little intuition, there are some teams that could feasibly improve their standing in 2018 compensatory picks if they cut certain players, and other teams that need to hope that certain teams don’t cut some of their former players.

Teams with CFAs signed
  • Dallas: The Cowboys currently have only one comp pick on the board, a 4th for Anthony Hitchens. However, none of the three low level CFAs they signed (Kony Ealy, Cameron Fleming, and Deonte Thompson) have guarantees larger than $1 million. If Dallas cuts any to all of them, they could pick up a maximum of an extra 6th round and two 7th round comp picks.
  • New York Giants: They are currently even with five CFAs each lost and gained. Of the five they gained, Michael Thomas and Cody Latimer could be the most vulnerable to being cut for comp pick reasons. It will not be cheap to cut either: Thomas was guaranteed $1.5 million, and almost all of Latimer’s $2.5 million was guaranteed. But if they cut one of the two before Week 10, it would open up a 4th rounder for one of Weston Richburg or Justin Pugh, and if they cut both it would open up an additional 5th or 6th for Devon Kennard. (Cutting Latimer would also end any scant hope the Broncos have to continue their comp pick streak.)
  • Detroit: They currently have one 5th round comp pick for DJ Hayden on the board. But the Lions could get a second 5th rounder for Tahir Whitehead if they cut one of their lower valued CFAs. Among those, Kenny Wiggins should feel the least secure for a roster spot, given that Detroit just drafted Frank Ragnow in the first round. Wiggins has only $750,000 in full guarantees, so it will be quite cheap for the Lions to move on from him if they so choose.
  • Seattle: Some regular comp pick seekers, like Green Bay and Denver, simply didn’t lose enough valuable CFAs to make it worth it to go after comp picks this year. But I’m having a hard time understanding how the Seahawks approached free agency this year. As I anticipated, the Seahawks lost high valued CFAs in Jimmy Graham, Sheldon Richardson, and Paul Richardson–all currently valued as 4th rounders. But Seattle instead signed 7 CFAs of their own, taking them way out of contention to earn any of those 4th rounders. Of those seven, they could cut four of them (Dontae Johnson, DJ Fluker, Tom Johnson, and Shamar Stephen) with little consequence, as all have guarantees at or below $1 million. But that’s not the case for the other three (Ed Dickson, Barkevious Mingo, and Jaron Brown). This year, it seems clear that John Schneider is taking an educated gamble that the CFAs he signed will be worth more than the 4th round comp picks he could have otherwise received via the Seahawks’ usual modus operandi in free agency.
Teams with CFAs lost
  • Baltimore: Ben Watson will turn 38 during the 2018 season, and the Saints only guaranteed $645,000 of his contract. If Watson fails to make the roster or decides to call it a career before the regular season, and Mike Wallace doesn’t qualify, it would jeopardize the Ravens’ 3rd or 4th round comp pick for Ryan Jensen.
  • Los Angeles Chargers: As mentioned above with Detroit, if Kenny Wiggins fails to make the roster, it will take the Chargers out of comp pick contention. They may also have to fear the same with Matt Slauson, who will now have to compete with 1st and 2nd round rookies Quenton Nelson and Braden Smith alongside incumbent Jack Mewhort for a starting job at guard.
  • Detroit: While the Lions could gain a comp pick, they could also lose the one they have now. Don Carey and Travis Swanson have minimal amounts of guaranteed money in their deals with the Jaguars and Jets, and if either fail to stick around then the Lions’ 5th rounder for DJ Hayden will have no choice but to come off the board.
  • Minnesota: With the Jets drafting Sam Darnold, Teddy Bridgewater’s roster spot is by no means safe. If he’s cut, the Vikings will see their 6th for him be demoted to a 7th for either Tom Johnson or Shamar Stephen. And speaking of those two, as described above Seattle may have their own comp pick reasons to cut them–that could potentially take comp picks off the board. (Fortunately for Minnesota, their 3rd rounder for Case Keenum should be as solid as they come.)
  • Atlanta: They will have to hope that Andre Roberts not only makes the Jets’ roster, but also qualifies for the formula. If he doesn’t, that could jeopardize their 5th rounder for Taylor Gabriel. They could rectify that by in turn cutting or benching Logan Paulsen, on the same salary as Roberts.
  • Carolina: Charles Johnson is another Jets receiver who could impact comp picks if he doesn’t make their roster. In Carolina’s case, they would lose a 6th rounder for Ed Dickson.

Contracts In Question After The 2018 NFL Draft’s 1st Round

The draft always paints a picture for the future, and the 1st round of the 2018 NFL Draft is no exception. As the picks came in, my mind often times immediately went to what implications certain picks could have for incumbent players on their respective teams. Here are my thoughts on veteran contracts that could be in jeopardy or subject to change in the near future.

Joe Flacco, QB, Ravens

Let’s start right at the end of the 1st round where the Ravens traded up to draft Lamar Jackson. Flacco’s gargantuan contract birthed from the failure of Rahim Moore to play deep is one of the most leveraged in the NFL with prorated bonus money. It’s thus made it impractical for the Ravens to part ways with Flacco for several seasons. 2019 will be the first season in which the Ravens could do so without incurring a cap loss. Although $16 million in dead money is still a large number, the Ravens would still save at least $10.5 million against the 2019 if they cut or traded Flacco. ($18.5 million if they used a June 1 designation). By drafting Jackson, the Ravens have set themselves up well with the option of giving him a redshirt in 2018 if need be, with the hope of holding a viable starter at quarterback in 2019 while they escape from the shackles of Flacco’s contract.

Teddy Bridgewater, QB, Jets

It was no secret that the Jets were going to take a quarterback in the first round once they gave up three 2nd round picks to move up to the 3rd overall selection. Now that Sam Darnold is in the fold, the Jets currently have five quarterbacks under contract. In addition to likely the biggest quarterback bust in the 2016 NFL Draft in Christian Hackenberg, Bridgewater’s place on the Jets could also be in jeopardy. His only guaranteed money was a $500,000 signing bonus. At $5.5 million, Bridgewater could also be an attractive trade offer for a team that does not fully satisfy their quarterback situation in the remainder of this year’s draft.

Sam Bradford, QB, Cardinals

Bradford’s official two year deal is better interpreted as a one year deal with an option for 2019. With the Cardinals succeeding in drafting Josh Rosen, it gives them flexibility to decline Bradford’s 2019 option, leaving behind only $5 million in dead money with $20 million in cap savings. Declining the option would also make Bradford eligible for the 2020 compensatory pick formula, and given Bradford’s knack in garnering huge contracts owing all the way back to being the last 1st overall pick in the old CBA, it could be likely that the Cardinals would get a 3rd round comp pick if they elect to decline his option and go with Rosen for 2019.

Marcell Dareus, 43DT, Jaguars

The Jaguars acquired Dareus’s bloated contract from the Bills in the middle of last season that treated them well in their defense fueled playoff push. But the drafting of Taven Bryan could spell the end of Dareus’s contract soon. After 2018, all of Dareus’s guaranteed money will have been earned. And because the Jaguars acquired Dareus by trade, they have no prorated bonus money from him on their books. That means come 2019, the Jaguars could be fully clear of over $10 million in salary should they part ways with Dareus at that time.

Shane Ray, 34OLB, Broncos

John Elway was noncommittal before the draft on picking up Ray’s fifth year option. It was good that he was, as one can never be for sure who will fall in one’s lap in the draft. That was the case with the Broncos, who had Bradley Chubb rated as their highest defensive player but had zero mock drafts in which they thought he would be available to him. With Ray’s 5th year option likely coming in at around $10.6 million, and the Broncos having the fifth least 2019 cap space at the moment, it may now be more likely than not that Denver will not pick up Ray’s option.

Shaquil Barrett, 34OLB, Broncos

The status of Ray could also affect Barrett, who is currently signed for a 2nd round RFA tender of about $2.9 million. With both Ray and Barrett heading to unrestricted free agency in 2019 if the Broncos decline Ray’s option, Denver could elect to reprise the situation they had in 2016 with Derek Wolfe and Malik Jackson: extending the one that was willing to do a more team friendly deal. Barrett as the long term #3 edge rusher behind Von Miller and Chubb could make good sense.

Mohamed Sanu, WR, Falcons

The drafting of Calvin Ridley would presume a plan to demote Sanu to a #3 WR option. Would paying him around $6 million each year from 2018 through 2020 be worth it for such a role? Sanu has no more guaranteed money left on his deal, and will gain cap space in any season if the Falcons decide at that time to move on from him.

Donald Penn, LT, Raiders

Drafting Kolton Miller fills an immediate need for the Raiders at right tackle. However, if the team thinks he could also play left tackle in the future, that could jeopardize Penn’s role with the team in 2019. That year, he will turn 36, and be due over $10 million, with none of it guaranteed, and no dead money on the Raiders’ books if they part ways with him then.

Khalil Mack, 43DE, Raiders

When the Raiders acquired Martavis Bryant from the Steelers, Jason noted that they will need to make some contract move(s) to free cap space before they sign their rookie class. If the Raiders want to avoid cutting anyone, they may need to move away from their practice of avoiding restructures and prorated bonuses like the plague. One reasonable move could come by an extension of Mack that provides him with a modest signing bonus. Mack has a similar reputation to Derek Carr, who did receive a $12.5 million signing bonus, so the Raiders could afford to do this without backing down on their modus operandi with lesser players.

What Should Teams Expect Out Of Their Rookie Classes?

A key goal of OTC’s new Rookie Class Evaluation section is to provide more insight and understanding as to how rookie classes pan out. Fans tend to get disappointed when many of their favorite team’s drafted rookies don’t perform as expected. But they and other observers of the NFL should be aware of what the typical rookie class yields. In this article, I intend to go through some statistics of rookie classes, largely parsed through the lenses of snap counts and vested veteran contracts, to attempt to establish reasonable benchmarks. Through this, some rookie classes that may look bad may in fact be closer to the leaguewide mean or median.

Total rookie class snap counts

As demonstrated in the Rookie Class Evaluation homepage, both the average Snap Index of a rookie class tends to be within a range of 8 to 10. What does this mean? For every team’s regular season, think of it as having 22 units of snaps to be completed, for the 22 players on the field at all times. (Kickers, punters, and long snappers do skew this, but not by much.) Multiply this by four seasons to get a total set of 88 units of snaps that members a rookie class can earn before they become vested veterans. Assuming a typical rookie class’s Snap Index to be around 9, divide 9 by 88 to discover that such a class would only participate in about 10% of the available snaps over those four seasons.

Total rookie class snap counts as rookies

Another source of disappointment I regularly sense from fans is when players in their rookie or first years do not immediately step on the field and contribute. I therefore took a look at the Snap Indices of rookie classes filtered only by snap counts from the players’ first accrued season. (This is usually, but not always, their rookie season.) Both the average and median Snap Indices hovered around 2.3. Divide 2.3 by 22, and you’ll see that rookies and first year players only get about 9% of the team’s snaps. This is not much lower than their typical contribution during their first four seasons, but is lower enough that some patience should be exercised when players new to the NFL, adjusting to the much high level of competition, don’t immediately perform as hoped.

Total vested veteran contracts earned from rookie classes

As described in the header to this respective table in the Rookie Class Evaluation homepage, less than half of drafted rookies go on to earn vested veteran contracts. Since each draft consists of an exact average of eight picks per team (seven regular rounds plus one round of compensatory picks distributed among the ends of regular rounds 3 to 7), this means that a typical draft slate should go on to generate 3 to 4 players (as well as about 1 UDFA) that make it past their fourth accrued season. In blunter terms, this means that more than half of the draft picks that a team makes won’t play more than four years in the NFL–and an even higher percentage won’t complete their rookie contracts with the team that originally acquired them. Keep that in mind when you look through a rookie class and feel tempted to woe about the multiple “busts” that it contained.

Vested veteran contracts earned from rookie classes, by round

Another aspect to keep in proper prospective is how successful players should expect to be based on at what level they were acquired by teams as rookies. Here is how this breakdown goes with vested veteran contracts earned, as of now from 2011-2014:

  • 1st: 65.6%/81.3%*
  • 2nd: 75.4%
  • 3rd: 60.6%
  • 4th: 51.0%
  • 5th: 42.8%
  • 6th: 32.7%
  • 7th: 21.1%
  • UDFA: 11.4%

*20 1st round picks from 2014 are still on their rookie contracts via the exercised fifth year option. The two figures listed here respectively exclude and include those players.

What this suggests is that four out of five 1st rounders should go on to play more than four years in the NFL. The same holds for three quarters of 2nd rounders, three out of five 3rd rounders, and about half of 4th rounders. It then becomes more likely than not that a player acquired in a lower level will not earn a vested contract.

Also keep in mind that if anything, these numbers may be overestimated, as many players signing their first vested veteran contract ever from the 2014 rookie classes may not go on to earn any money on those contracts, as they make not make a roster in 2018. In any matter, when judging how well a team does in each round, or in undrafted free agency, keep these percentages in mind as a benchmark before being too critical.

Vested veteran contracts earned from rookie classes, by position

As a bonus, here’s a similar breakdown by position, as there is often scattered discussion about which positions are more “valuable” in the NFL:

  • Quarterback: 46.77%
  • Running back & fullback: 30.19%
  • Wide receiver: 30.20%
  • Tight end: 37.38%
  • Tackle: 51.52%
  • Guard: 50.00%
  • Center: 46.15%
  • Interior defensive line (all defensive tackles and 3-4 defensive ends): 40.00%
  • Edge rushers (4-3 defensive ends and 3-4 outside linebackers): 43.80%
  • Traditional linebackers (4-3 outside linebackers and all inside linebackers): 48.98%
  • Safety: 32.85%
  • Cornerback: 36.61%
  • Kicker, punter & long snapper: 46.30%

It makes intuitive sense for more offensive linemen and quarterbacks to earn vested veteran contracts that running backs. It’s less so for traditional linebackers getting there more frequently than wide receivers or defensive backs.

****

In a week, we’ll begin learning some key information on the future of teams when they draft 256 new players into the league, plus sign hundreds of undrafted players. Remember that it will take at least four years to properly judge how teams did in those efforts–and within that time, most of those players will not last in the league as long as you might think.

The Best Rookie Classes By Snap Counts, 2011-2014

To add some context to OTC’s Rookie Class Evaluation, here’s a look at the best 12 rookie classes from 2011-2014. The class’s Snap Index is indicated in parentheses, and links to each rookie class are contained within the number of vested veteran contracts and extensions were secured from the class.

1. 2014 Jaguars (21.483)

11 players with vested veteran contracts, 7 of which were extensions

Perhaps the 2017 Jaguars’ playoff run should not have been as surprising when looking at this rookie class. The quality of the play of Blake Bortles may be under heavy debate, but he at least emerged as a four year starter on his rookie contract. Bortles was also bolstered by a center in Brandon Linder and three receivers who all played more than half of the available snaps in Marqise Lee, Allen Robinson, and Allen Hurns—and that’s even with Robinson suffering a season ending injury early in 2017. This rookie class also secured two solid defenders in Aaron Colvin and Telvin Smith. Among the Jaguars’ 9 draft picks, only one (their last one in 7th rounder Storm Johnson) failed to earn a vested veteran contract.

2. 2014 Raiders (19.626)

6 players with vested veteran contracts, 4 of which were extensions

This rookie class may have saved the job of GM Reggie McKenzie, and may be still saving it today with the return of Jon Gruden. Out of it they got a starting quarterback (Derek Carr), edge rusher (Khalil Mack) and guard (Gabe Jackson) who all played at least 89% of the snaps under their rookie deals. They also got more defensive help in Justin Ellis and TJ Carrie, and could have bolstered the contribution even more had they not given up on Shelby Harris, who is now with their archrival in the Broncos.

3. 2012 Rams (18.979)

8 players with vested veteran contracts, 6 of which were extensions

Your first thought may be that this rookie class is unfairly weighted due to getting extra high draft picks from the Robert Griffin III trade. But that only explains part of the story. To go along with the likes of Michael Brockers, Janoris Jenkins, Trumaine Johnson, and Greg Zuerlein among the draftees, the Rams also found three contributors among the undrafted in Rodney McLeod, Johnny Hekker, and Cory Harkey.

4. 2012 Seahawks (18.392)

11 players with vested veteran contracts, 4 of which were extensions

The second of two consecutive rookie classes that led to the meteoric rise of the Seahawks under John Schneider, the crown jewels are of course Russell Wilson and Bobby Wagner. Seattle also got significant contribution from JR Sweezy, Bruce Irvin, and Jeremy Lane among the drafted, and from Jermaine Kearse and DeShawn Shead among the undrafted.

5. 2013 Falcons (18.247)

6 players with vested veteran contracts, 5 of which were extensions

A quietly excellent rookie class, the Falcons started by securing two starting cornerbacks with their first two picks in Desmond Trufant and Robert Alford. In the rest of the class they got some depth contributions from Levine Toilolo and Kemal Ishmael, and among the undrafted they found a starting right tackle (Ryan Schraeder) and inside linebacker (Paul Worrilow).

6. 2011 Broncos (16.822)

7 players with vested veteran contracts, 3 of which were extensions

John Elway’s first rookie acquisition as a GM was Super Bowl 50 MVP and likely Hall of Famer Von Miller. He followed it up with two more players (Rahim Moore and Orlando Franklin) who started at least three-quarters of available snaps on their rookie contracts, and continued it with two tight end finds later in the draft in Julius Thomas and Virgil Green. This stellar introductory rookie class for Elway ends with the acquisition of Pro Bowl cornerback Chris Harris, Jr. in undrafted free agency.

7. 2011 Browns (15.672)

4 players with vested veteran contracts

Wait, a Browns rookie class makes the top ten? Yes, indeed, the 2011 Browns rookie class got a heavy amount of snap counts. You may argue that some of these snaps were not high quality, and indeed, players like Greg Little and Jason Pinkston really skew this. On the other hand, there were players like Jabaal Sheard, Jordan Cameron, Buster Skrine, and Craig Robertson who were able to parlay their rookie contract snaps into vested veteran deals. The key, of course, is that none of them came via extensions from the Browns.

8. 2011 Seahawks (15.532)

8 players with vested veteran contracts, 4 of which were extensions

And here’s the first of those two monster Seahawks rookie classes. This one was actually quite poor in the first three rounds, with only first rounder John Carpenter being a regular contributor. But the third day of the draft was of course outstanding with the selections on defense of Richard Sherman, KJ Wright, Byron Maxwell, and Malcolm Smith. The cherry on top of this class was finding Doug Baldwin as an undrafted free agent.

9. 2012 Browns (15.230)

7 players with vested veteran contracts, 1 of which was an extension

Wait, two Browns rookie classes make the top ten? Much like 2011, this was a class in which the Browns failed to retain any of the talent they obtained. But unlike 2011, the 2012 class is more of an example of the Browns actually drafting well. Yes, Trent Richardson and Brandon Weeden were major busts that contributed little, but they followed them up with a 100% snap count starter in Mitchell Schwartz, and also got some contribution in the later rounds of the draft from John Hughes, Travis Benjamin and Billy Winn. Then, among the undrafted they found Tashaun Gipson, who soon emerged as a regular starter. And here’s the shocker: this snap count index could go up even higher despite being six years ago. That’s because it also includes Josh Gordon, taken in the supplemental draft. The reason why is that he has accrued only two seasons due to multiple suspensions—and in those two seasons he averaged around 80% of snaps in a high quality matter. Should Gordon be able to return to that lofty level, this Browns rookie class could rise all the way to 6th on this list in the future.

10. 2013 Lions (15.213)

6 players with vested veteran contracts, 4 of which were extensions

This rookie class may have been what it took to finally dig the Lions out from regular bottom feeders to at least respectable mediocrity. They got two starters on defense in Ezekiel Ansah and Darius Slay that are still with the team today, as well as some more contribution from Devin Taylor. On offense, they got a part of their running back squad in Theo Riddick, and a starting guard in Larry Warford. They even got their punter (Sam Martin) in this rookie class.

11. 2012 Vikings (15.155)

9 players with vested veteran contracts, 5 of which were extensions

Though the Vikings got no UDFAs of note from this rookie class, their draft picks were solid from start to almost finish. Among their nine draft picks, only the last one (Trevor Guyton) failed to complete his rookie contract. Among the other eight, Matt Kalil and Harrison Smith are of course the highest contributors, with four others (Josh Robinson, Jarius Wright, Rhett Ellison, and Robert Blanton) all contributing at least 37% of available snaps throughout their rookie contracts.

12. 2014 Packers (14.711)

5 players with vested veteran contracts, 3 of which were extensions

A Ted Thompson rookie class barely makes the top twelve. This effort garnered Ha-Ha Clinton-Dix, Davante Adams, and Corey Linsey among the drafted players, and four UDFAs contributed to some extent on their rookie deals in Green Bay.

The Worst Rookie Classes By Snap Counts, 2011-2014

To add some context to OTC’s Rookie Class Evaluation, here’s a look at the worst 12 rookie classes from 2011-2014. The class’s Snap Index is indicated in parentheses, and links to each rookie class are contained within the number of vested veteran contracts and extensions were secured from the class.

1. 2012 49ers (2.148)

3 players with vested veteran contracts, 2 of which were extensions

Undrafted free agents Tony Jerod-Eddie and Garrett Celek were the only thing saving this rookie class, as the draft slate was one of the worst we’ve seen in a long time, highlighted by megabusts AJ Jenkins and LaMichael James. No players from that draft made it through their rookie contracts, and only one (Joe Looney) made it to the third year. If Jerod-Eddie and Celek are taken out of the equation, the 2012 49ers’ snap index from rookie contracts would be only 0.475. That’s the equivalent of getting only 47.5% of snaps out of one player for one season. No matter what way you slice it, this was a very bad year for rookie acquisition in San Francisco.

2. 2013 Browns (2.431)

2 players with vested veteran contracts

It seems right to see a Browns rookie class high on this list. But even then, this score is a bit misleading due to not having many draft picks to begin with. They used their 2nd rounder from this draft on Josh Gordon in the prior year, and deferred several other picks to 2014, where they once again had a high snap count index. But on the other hand, none of their five draft picks were able to finish their rookie contracts in Cleveland, and their UDFA class was practically barren. That doesn’t excuse the Browns from a poor performance among 2013 rookies.

3. 2011 Lions (3.089)

2 players with vested veteran contracts

1st round pick Nick Fairley worked out OK, although he was the only non-quarterback taken in the first half of this draft who didn’t make the Pro Bowl. But the 2nd round was an utter disaster for the Lions. They first selected Titus Young, who had a litany of off the field problems, and then sacrificed their 3rd and 4th round picks to get Mikel Leshoure, who only had one year of any production. To make matters worse for this rookie class, Ricardo Silva was the only UDFA to log any snaps with the Lions from this class.

4. 2013 Seahawks (4.183)

5 players with vested veteran contracts, 1 of which was an extension

Even the great GMs like John Schneider can lay an egg in rookie acquisition. 2013’s effort was not helped out by relinquishing their 1st rounder to the Vikings (who used it on Xavier Rhodes) in the ill-fated Percy Harvin trade. But even then, the Seahawks had 11 draft picks, and of them only Luke Willson made it through his rookie contract, and he was also the only one to even play in more than a quarter of possible snaps. Furthermore, Alvin Bailey was the only undrafted free agent to contribute to any significance.

5. 2013 Broncos (4.487)

5 players with vested veteran contracts, 1 of which was an extension

Like Schneider, the normally sharp John Elway threw a duck on getting rookies in 2013.  1st rounder Sylvester Williams at least was a regular starter at nose tackle, and 3rd rounder Kayvon Webster became a solid #4 CB behind the trio of Chris Harris, Aqib Talib and Bradley Roby. But the Broncos got nothing out of Day 3 of the draft, and 2nd rounder Montee Ball’s troubles with alcohol made him one of the bigger busts in Broncos draft history. On the brighter side, the miss on Ball was indemnified by finding CJ Anderson as an undrafted free agent, the only one of these rookies to stay with the Broncos beyond his rookie contract.

6. 2011 Colts (4.547)

2 players with vested veteran contracts, 1 of which was an extension

Even Hall of Fame GMs like Bill Polian can join Schneider and Elway with a particularly terrible rookie class. His last such class is one that Colts fans will not look upon fondly. The only player of significance Indianapolis got out of this effort was Anthony Castonzo, who at least became a regular starter at left tackle, and is still with the team to this day.

7. 2013 Colts (4.604)

No players with a vested veteran contract

After inexplicably beating Elway by one vote for 2012 Executive Of The Year, Ryan Grigson quickly fell back down to earth with this thud of a rookie class that included 1st round bust Bjoern Werner. Hugh Thornton was the only player to garner more than half of possible snaps on his rookie contract, and special teamer Josh McNary was the only undrafted free agent to log a snap beyond special teams.

8. 2012 Saints (4.674)

4 players with vested veteran contracts, 1 of which was an extension

The low snap index on this rookie class needs caveats, as was hobbled by relinquishing the Saints’ 1st rounder in acquiring Mark Ingram the previous year, and also by being stripped of their 2nd rounder due to the bounty scandal. Still, only running back Travaris Cadet finished his rookie contract on the Saints, and while Akiem Hicks and Corey White are still active today as vested veterans, neither did so as members of the Saints.

9. 2014 Saints (4.990)

No players yet with a vested veteran contract

Unlike with 2012, the Saints have fewer excuses for bombing rookie acquisition in 2014. Brandin Cooks was the only drafted player that amounted to anything in the NFL, and he was famously traded to the Patriots after three seasons with the team. On the brighter side, what saved this rookie class from ranking even worse was the contribution of seven UDFAs, with Brandon Coleman and Kasim Edebali being the most noteworthy.

10. 2012 Falcons (5.068)

1 player with a vested veteran contract, who also got an extension

This draft was without a 1st rounder due to the Julio Jones trade (of which the Browns used on Brandon Weeden), so it deserves an asterisk by it for this reason. But beyond that this was still not one of Tom Dimitroff’s finer efforts. Only one of these rookies made it through their rookie contract in Atlanta, and that one player was Josh Harris, the long snapper.

11. 2014 Jets (5.072)

No players yet with a vested veteran contract

There will still be hope for this rookie class to get out of the bottom twelve with Quincy Enunwa, the clear leader of the class, still having to serve one more year before he becomes a vested veteran. But other than Enunwa and Brent Qvale, the Jets’ only undrafted free agent to log any snaps, Dakota Dozier may end up being the only other member of this class to finish his rookie contract on the Jets. This was the rookie class that featured a trio of busts at the top in Calvin Pryor, Jace Amaro, and Dexter McDougle.

12. 2012 Raiders (5.440)

6 players with vested veteran contracts, 1 of which was an extension

In fairness to Reggie McKenzie, he conducted his inaugural rookie acquisition as a GM with both hands tied behind his back. The Raiders’ 1st, 3rd, and 4th round picks had been relinquished beforehand by Al Davis or Hue Jackson to acquire three different quarterbacks: Carson Palmer, Terrelle Pryor, and Jason Campbell. Davis had also traded away the Raiders’ 2nd rounder last year to a frequent partner at the time, the New England Patriots. At one point, McKenzie only had two picks (a 5th and a 6th) in the entire draft to work with, until compensatory picks bailed him out.

Despite all those caveats, the seven draft picks McKenzie did end up with contributed very little. The two most notable contributors to the Raiders ended up being two undrafted free agents: wide receiver Rod Streater, and punter Marquette King, who the Raiders just recently cut (and is now with archrival Denver) after being the only player from this rookie class to get an extension from the Raiders. But what may hurt the most was giving up on Jack Crawford too early; he ended up putting together a decent performance with the Cowboys, and now is a vested veteran on the Falcons.

Introducing OTC’s Rookie Class Evaluation

With the 2018 NFL Draft approaching, I felt it would be appropriate to take a look at some of the aspects of acquiring rookies in the NFL that may be important in building a roster as a whole. This effort can be found in OTC’s new Rookie Class Evaluation section.

This section takes a look at two metrics–snap counts and vested veteran contracts–and breaks down each rookie class (including both drafted and undrafted players) based on those metrics. To learn more about the methodology behind these metrics, please read this article.

The goal of this project is to give observers of the NFL more perspective into what makes a good rookie class. In particular, observers will likely have high hopes about the new rookies that teams acquire in a couple weeks. But four years from now, we will learn that many of them will not play as much as observers may think, and most will fail to earn a contract in the NFL past their first four seasons. When this happens, a team’s efforts in building a rookie class are often seen as a failure. But in many cases, those efforts may in fact be closer to the leaguewide mean or median.

From now until the draft, I hope to put forward some more articles from the observations I’ve learned from this project. In the meantime, I encourage you to visit the Rookie Class Evaluation section. If there are any observations of your own, suggestions to improve the existing metrics or to propose additional metrics, please do not hesitate to submit those comments.

2019 Compensatory Picks Potential

With the deadline for placing the franchise or transition tag on players now in the past, we can take a closer look as to how teams could approach free agency with respect to gaining potential for compensatory picks a year from now. A few of the factors that come into judging potential for each team are as follows:

  • The quantity of unrestricted free agents eligible for the compensatory formula. Teams with more pending UFAs will have more opportunities for players to count in their comp pick formula on the positive side of compensatory free agents (CFAs) lost. Teams that lose a high quantity of CFAs may also be able to sign low level CFAs of their own without risking the cancellation of higher valued CFAs.You can take a look at all UFAs by going to OTC’s main free agency page, and filter the list by UFA.
  • The quality of unrestricted free agents eligible for the compensatory formula. Teams that have a low number of pending UFAs may still have one or two players that are expected to garner a high level contract elsewhere. In this case, these teams may try to eschew signing CFAs at all to ensure that they can get a high comp pick for the high level players in question.OTC’s 2018 Top 100 Free Agents list is a good place to go to see which UFAs may be valued higher than a 7th rounder in the comp pick formula should they sign with a new team.
  • Salary cap space. Teams with a low amount of cap space may naturally get some comp picks simply because they’re unable to spend much in free agency. Teams with the most cap space, even if they have a high quantity or quality of CFAs lost, may have no choice to cancel them out in an effort to improve their roster.As always, you can find OTC’s real time estimates of each team’s cap space here.

Below is a breakdown of each team’s 2019 compensatory pick potential. Note that OTC Top 100 Free Agents that have been franchise or transition tagged are excluded from their respective team’s sum.

Bills

Pending UFAs: 18
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 3

Among starters, Jordan Matthews, Preston Brown, Ramon Humber and EJ Gaines are all seeing contracts expire. The 34 year old Kyle Williams can’t be ruled out either despite being a longtime Bill. With 18 total pending UFAs to work with, Brandon Beane can certainly work the compensatory pick formula if he so chooses to despite not having big stars set to hit the market. Potential: Moderate

Dolphins

Pending UFAs: 16
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 2

Jarvis Landry has been franchise tagged, but the Dolphins are also trying to trade him. Should Landry sign the tag, he will be out of compensatory pick consideration no matter what. But if the Dolphins rescind the tag before he signs, he will go back in the formula, like Josh Norman did for the Panthers when he left for DC. The Dolphins don’t have much else to work with (unless you think Jay Cutler will stay out of retirement for anyone other than the Dolphins), but cramped cap space could naturally create comp picks for the Dolphins even if Landry doesn’t yield them anything. Potential: Moderate

Patriots

Pending UFAs: 13
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 3

Malcolm Butler and Nate Solder are two big names hitting unrestricted free agency at very valuable positions. Add on some mid level CFA candidates like Rex Burkhead, Dion Lewis, Cameron Fleming, LaAdrian Waddle, and Johnson Bademosi, and the Patriots, as usual, have an opportunity to expand their 2019 draft pick slate. Potential: High

Jets

Pending UFAs: 16
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 5

The Jets have plenty of pending UFAs, and they also have several names that could be intriguing on the open market but aren’t stone cold locks to get large contracts. Those are players like Austin Seferian-Jenkins, Morris Claiborne, Kony Ealy, Demario Davis, and even the well traveled Josh McCown. That’s something for the Jets to work with, but the question is whether they can afford to eschew unrestricted free agency with high cap space and at the point their franchise is in. Potential: Low

Ravens

Pending UFAs: 12
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 2

Possible comp pick candidates for Ozzie Newsome this year could include Mike Wallace, Ben Watson, Crockett Gillmore, Ryan Jensen, and James Hurst. Brandon Carr might have his option declined, and backup quarterback Ryan Mallett can’t be counted out either. That’s something for the Ravens to work with. The question is how much the team will want to stay out of free agency, something they haven’t been myopic about in recent years. Potential: Moderate

Bengals

Pending UFAs: 10
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 2

Tyler Eifert is the leading name by far for the Bengals. The question is whether or not his recent stint on IR will hurt his value. Beyond Eifert, Jeremy Hill, Russell Bodine, Kevin Minter, and perhaps Andre Smith are the other starting level players with expiring contracts. The Bengals do have a history of emphasizing collecting compensatory picks, so they can’t be counted off even if Eifert does not get a big contract, or is retained by the Bengals. Potential: Moderate

Browns

Pending UFAs: 4
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 1

With the Browns fully embracing an emphasis on getting players from the draft, it results with Cleveland having only four pending UFAs for 2018, easily the lowest in the league. One of them is Isaiah Crowell who could get a decent deal elsewhere, but with so few CFA candidates and high cap space coming off an 0-16 season it strikes as unlikely that the Browns will abstain completely from external CFAs just to get a comp pick for Crowell. Potential: Very Low

Steelers

Pending UFAs: 6
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 1

With Le’Veon Bell receiving a second straight franchise tag, the Steelers have only 6 other pending UFAs. Chris Hubbard may be a dark horse candidate to get a reasonable contract in a thin right tackle market, but there’s not much else to work with. Thus, the Steelers may see another draft not bolstered by comp picks.  Potential: Very Low

Texans

Pending UFAs: 16
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 1

Tom Savage may not get a big deal as far as quarterbacks are concerned, but even a standard backup veteran contract could return something better than a 7th round comp pick. Left guard Xavier Su’a-Filo and longtime cornerback Johnathan Joseph also have expiring contracts. There’s a decent change for the Texans to pick up comp picks for a second straight season if they care work on it. Potential: Moderate

Colts

Pending UFAs: 13
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 3

Donte Moncrief, Jack Mewhort, and Rashaan Melvin are the main young names to watch. The ageless Frank Gore will also be allowed to go to free agency, as is longtime vet Darius Butler. If lower level CFAs leave the Colts can also get some padding to sign external CFAs while still preserving possible comp picks. Potential: Moderate

Jaguars

Pending UFAs: 8
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 4

For the first time in a long time, the Jaguars might have a fighting chance to get compensatory picks. This is especially true with Allen Robinson not getting tagged. Fellow wide receiver Marqise Lee is someone that could depart for a decent deal as well. Aaron Colvin could get more playing time not being alongside Jalen Ramsey and AJ Bouye. Even backup quarterback Chad Henne could fetch a comp pick worthy deal. What works against this is that the Jaguars have only a total of 8 pending UFAs, and a reasonable amount of cap space even after extending Blake Bortles. This is a team that has not been afraid to be aggressive in free agency, but unlike in past years this time they do have possible departing CFAs that they could cancel out if they do so. Potential: Moderate

Titans

Pending UFAs: 9
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 4

The Titans only have 9 pending UFAs, and Eric Decker may be the only one that could fetch anything more than a 7th round comp pick. With plenty of cap space in hand and still more work to do to get the Titans to the top, they’ll likely continue to pursue some external CFAs to get them where they want to be. Potential: Very Low

Broncos

Pending UFAs: 10
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 1

Currently the Broncos have few UFA concerns. Linebackers Todd Davis and Corey Nelson and tight end Virgil Green would be the leading names, and Cody Latimer might be able to fetch a decent special teams contract if the Broncos don’t retain him. But this might be the rare year under John Elway in which the Broncos forego comp picks, especially if they are active in the veteran quarterback market.   Potential: Low

Chiefs

Pending UFAs: 17
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 3

Bennie Logan signed a 1-year “prove it” deal last year, and now we’ll see if he’s proven enough to get a good long term deal. Albert Wilson is another name that’s getting some buzz in the wide receiver market. The Chiefs also have their longtime punter (Dustin Colquitt) hitting the market. Kansas City also has a decent quantity of pending UFAs to work with, but unless Logan and/or Wilson walk for a big deal elsewhere the Chiefs might not get more than 6th or 7th round comp picks. Potential: Moderate

Chargers

Pending UFAs: 13
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 2

The most notable pending UFA is 37 year old Antonio Gates, and it would be jarring to see him wear anything else than a Chargers jersey before his career ends. There are some other lower profile players like Tenny Palepoi or Branden Oliver that could sign elsewhere as CFAs, but the Chargers should not expect a lot of comp picks to come out of their UFA slate. Potential: Low

Raiders

Pending UFAs: 10
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 4

The Raiders got 4 comp picks in the 6th round from free agency defection last year when they had 10 CFAs leave to go elsewhere. This year, they only have 10 CFA candidates total. Of them, Justin Ellis, Denico Autry, and TJ Carrie may be the only notable ones, with late acquisition NaVarro Bowman a possibility as well. Reggie McKenzie comes from the Ted Thompson tree that prioritizes comp picks, and his 2018 haul in the 6th round should prove that, but there may not be much to work with for 2019. Potential: Low

Cowboys

Pending UFAs: 10
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 1

With DeMarcus Lawrence having signed his franchise tag, the Cowboys now have only 10 pending UFAs left, and few of them are of note. The likes of Anthony Hitchens or Alfred Morris may not be enough to be worth it for the Cowboys to pursue compensatory picks this year. Potential: Very Low

Giants

Pending UFAs: 18
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 3

The Giants have two starting interior offensive linemen in Justin Pugh and Weston Richburg with expiring contracts.  This would make them prime comp pick candidates should they leave. Among Pugh and Richburg, the Giants have a high number of pending UFAs, so they could also tack on some other lower comp picks for the likes of Shane Vereen, Orleans Darkwa, or Jonathan Casillas. Potential: High

Eagles

Pending UFAs: 13
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 4

With all of the Eagles’ star players extended they have, they have very little cap space to work with. That could naturally put them in play for comp picks if they’re unable to sign any CFAs of note. There aren’t many notable names among their pending UFAs, but the few that are could get the Eagles more than just 7th rounders. Those players to keep an eye on include Nigel Bradham, Trey Burton, and Patrick Robinson. Potential: Moderate

Redskins

Pending UFAs: 18
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 7

Kirk Cousins will become the very rare starting QB in his prime to enter unrestricted free agency. If the Redskins play their cards correctly, they should secure the highest compensatory pick to be awarded at 97th overall in 2018. The Redskins, a team that likes to participate aggressively in free agency, has to be careful not to cancel out Cousins. But even beyond him, Washington has a high quantity of pending UFAs to deal with. They also have a high quality: among them include Bashaud Breeland, Trent Murphy, Zach Brown, and Ryan Grant. Compensatory picks are rare in DC, but this might be the year where their usual drought gets snapped. Potential: Very High

Bears

Pending UFAs: 18
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 3

As is usually the case for Chicago, they have a high quantity of pending UFAs but a low quality, especially with Kyle Fuller now getting the transition tag. The Bears typically do not care about compensatory picks and there’s little to suggest that that will change now, especially with the Bears possessing a high amount of cap space. Potential: Very Low

Lions

Pending UFAs: 16
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 2

With Ziggy Ansah’s path to free agency impeded by the franchise tag, that could mean good news for starters like Travis Swanson or Tahir Whitehead who will enter the market unimpeded. With 16 total pending UFAs the Lions have plenty of flexibility to push for 2019 compensatory picks if they’re unable or unwilling to retain some of their own. Potential: Moderate

Packers

Pending UFAs: 10
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 1

With Ted Thompson and his famous aversion to CFAs no longer in the head seat in Green Bay, it will be interesting to see if anything changes with the Packers. Successor Brian Gutekunst has only 10 pending UFAs after starters like Davante Adams and Corey Linsley were extended. With only the likes of Morgan Burnett or Richard Rodgers remaining, this suggests that the Packers don’t have much to work with, but this is Green Bay being talked about, so they can’t be counted out yet until we see it before our eyes. Potential: Low

Vikings

Pending UFAs: 13
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 5

Has there ever been a team that has three (albeit debated) starting caliber QBs hitting the market at once? That’s what the Vikings have on hand with Case Keenum, Sam Bradford, and Teddy Bridgewater. Even if the Vikings retain one of them or sign another veteran QB that would cancel out the loss of one of them, the other two could yield high compensatory picks for 2019 even if they’re on backup deals. Jerick McKinnon is also another CFA candidate for the Vikings as they’ll have Dalvin Cook coming off IR and Latavius Murray still under contract. With the Vikings in a much better position now to hold off on signing CFAs from other teams, they could be in a great position to reap the benefits. Potential: Very High

Falcons

Pending UFAs: 15
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 3

Dontari Poe signed a one year “prove it” deal with the Falcons last year, and we’ll see if he has indeed proved it for 2018. Adrian Clayborn is coming off one of the best years of his career with an expiring deal on hand in Atlanta. Taylor Gabriel may be able to get a starting wide receiver deal. These pending UFAs, plus lower cap space compared to other teams, could yield some decent compensatory picks for Atlanta in 2019. Potential: High

Panthers

Pending UFAs: 12
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 3

Andrew Norwell is expected to get a big contract, either from the Panthers or elsewhere. 2013 first round pick Star Lotulelei’s rookie contract is expiring, and given the money already dedicated to Kawann Short retaining him may not be practical. Ed Dickson and the ageless Julius Peppers also have contracts expiring. That could give Carolina something to work with for 2019 comp picks if they so choose, though they may need to hold off signing some CFAs to make it happen. Potential: High

Saints

Pending UFAs: 19
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 3

Drew Brees has set up his contractual situation in a way where the Saints cannot prevent him from hitting the open market if he so chooses. Most signs point to Brees staying in New Orleans, and even if he did walk, because he has well over 10 accrued seasons the maximum the Saints could get from him via a comp pick is a 5th rounder. Plus, they might have to sign a CFA quarterback of their own to replace him. Besides Brees, the Saints do have 18 other pending UFAs, and one of them is 2013 first round pick Kenny Vaccaro, a player that could fetch a decent comp pick. On the other hand, no team may care less about compensatory picks than the Saints, so it’s best to lean toward the assumption that that trend will hold. Potential: Low

Buccaneers

Pending UFAs: 14
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 2

Tampa Bay has a decent quantity of CFA candidates, but most of the notable ones are older players like TJ Ward, Brent Grimes, or the well traveled Ryan Fitzpatrick. Left guard Kevin Pamphile may be the only notable younger player with an expiring contract. There’s no obvious candidate for a high comp pick like there was for Mike Glennon last year, so the Bucs may be better suited to improve their roster via CFA signings. Potential: Low

Cardinals

Pending UFAs: 19
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 4

The Cardinals are similar to the Bucs with many pending UFAs that also mainly consist of older players. Two exceptions are similarly named wide receivers in John Brown and Jaron Brown, and Justin Bethel may be able to get a better deal that they previous extension he signed to stay in Arizona. The question for the Cardinals will be whether or not they want to turn over an older roster into a younger one. Potential: Moderate

Rams

Pending UFAs: 12
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 4

Trumaine Johnson will finally be allowed to enter free agency after two successive franchise tags. The Rams may finally end up yielding the high compensatory pick for him that they could have in years past. The Rams gave up a 2nd round pick to get Sammy Watkins in a contract year, and if they don’t retain them it’s feasible they could get a high comp pick for him to partially offset what they gave up for him. Nickell Robey-Coleman, Connor Barwin and John Sullivan are other starters or notable backups that could yield decent deals. The Rams do have a fairly high amount of cap space so they spend on other CFAs if they so choose, but if they don’t they’ll well positioned to yield 2019 comp picks. Potential: High

49ers

Pending UFAs: 15
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 3

Eric Reid, Carlos Hyde, and Tank Carradine are young starters slated to hit the UFA market. However, the 49ers will have the most 2018 cap space in the league and their roster still has a lot of work to do to become a contender. It would not be surprising to see San Francisco either invest big money either in their own CFA candidates, or invest in external CFAs. Potential: Low

Seahawks

Pending UFAs: 16
OTC Top 100 Free Agents: 5

John Schneider is well known in emphasizing compensatory pick acquisition, and they’re set up well to do so for the 2019 draft. Like the Rams, they have the ability to recoup some draft capital from the 2nd rounder they gave up for Sheldon Richardson should he walk. Jimmy Graham, Paul Richardson, DeShawn Shead, Byron Maxwell, Eddie Lacy, and Luke Joeckel all have expiring contracts as well.  Add in 2018 cap space that’s on the lower end and it seems likely that the Seahawks will get several 2019 compensatory picks, with some of them high ones. Potential: Very High