The Danger of the Contract Restructure

The other day ESPN’s Chris Mortensen tweeted about how the NFL doesn’t really have hard cap like people think because of the ability to go “cash over cap”, meaning the ability to spend a large portion of cash dollars in one year but because of proration minimal cap dollars.

https://twitter.com/mortreport/status/306752633803243520

So that got me thinking that this might be a good topic for a post with all of the contract restructures going on.  The point that Mortensen misses is the fact that in the NFL at some point the bill becomes due. This isn’t a game where you can sit over the cap and use mid level exceptions to bring in competent veteran players. Essentially what happens to a poorly managed team is they either get stuck with significant amounts of “dead money” for cutting players or get stuck with “dead weight” players who must be kept on the team because of the high dead money charges associated with those players because the team went “cash over cap” at some point in the prior few years.

Currently I have $124.6 million in dead money around the league accounted for in 2013. That is an entire teams salary cap of just dead money. And I know there is more I just haven’t been able to accrue it all or discover all of it from last season as I work through the early days of the website. Last season the New England Patriots carried around $22 million in dead money because of poor roster decisions. They are still paying off Chad Ochocincos cap money.  That’s a great team but don’t you think if they had a little more money to spend maybe they would have gone that one extra game?

Let’s look at the New York Jets. That is my team and I know their cap as well as anyone with the exception of those who  work for the team. The Jets did what Mortensen is talking about in 2011. They went heavy “cash over cap” after back to back championship appearances to take another run at it. What happened?  The team bombed and finished 8-8. In 2012 the Jets had to be more fiscally responsible due to dead weight players such as Bart Scott and Calvin Pace, who could not be removed from the team due to cap considerations. Had the Jets not “gone for it” in 2011 those players would have been gone a year before. As soon as the cap allowed those two were released.

Restructures are part of the NFL. The tricky part is to not abuse the restructured deal. For those newer to the salary cap a restructure is essentially shuffling of money in a contract to lower the cap charge in the present.  Normally what happens is you convert a large portion of a players base salary into a signing bonus that is then prorated over the remainder of the contract. Some teams, like the Jets, will get players to agree to a lower salary via a pure paycut by guaranteeing a future years salary, but most go the bonus route.

The most recent trick that teams have begun using is the addition of voidable years onto the backend f a contract. That allows a team to push prorated money into years when the player will be a free agent. Sounds great, except when the player becomes a free agent all that money accelerates onto the salary cap. So the Dallas Cowboys, who have begun to extensively use this mechanism, are now locked into $8.181 million of dead money for Tony Romo if they cant extend him before 2014 due to these void years. And what does Dallas have to show for that?  No playoff wins and bad losses in week 17 to miss out to their hated NFC East rivals?

I think there is a limit to restructuring contracts to keep them reasonable for a team. With the exception of the QB position no player should ever be restructured more than once over the course of their contract. The career of the NFL player is too short and in most cases they will not have the impact needed to make a true difference in the outcome of the season. Once you do it you need to shelve it. Each restructure  more or less adds another season in which you are forced to keep a player and it is rare that teams hold onto players beyond their rookie deals for another 4 or 5 years unless money forces them to keep them forever.

The most active teams in the last few days in terms of restructures have been the Steelers, Cowboys, and Saints.  All three have basically become “serial offenders” of the restructure game and every year are faced with cap issues. Of the three Pittsburgh is the best managed and does not go the route of the voidable years which makes them much more responsible. That being said they have players at this point who are being restructured every season. They have tried to be very careful with doing it only with players that they think are long term contributors but they have some older players this year where they may feel the need to make more moves. The Saints are backloading contracts at the start and just going deeper and deeper seemingly afraid to break up a team that won a Super Bowl in 2009 and hasn’t come close since. Dallas pays high at the start of a contract with huge signing bonuses and still has the need to restructure contracts far out into the future. Clearly it hasn’t worked.

At some point the philosophy becomes a problem which is why the cap works in the league despite Mortensen’s claim. The Steelers have almost $120 million committed to the 2014 salary cap already. That’s not awful until you realize its only for 32 players. They have a little flexibility if they don’t go deeper but that’s not a good situation. He Saints have 45 players under contract at a payroll of just over $130 million and little room to go unless they want to push more into the future for players like Drew Brees who already have huge hits on the books. Come 2015 they have $97 million in salary cap tied up in 17 players.

And then there is Dallas. Dallas is in so deep on their players its ridiculous. They have $134 million set for the 2014 cap and that is assuming that Tony Romo is off the team at an $8 million dead money clip. Clearly Romo is going to be part of the team which is just going to push the number higher. Sure they will cut Doug Free and Jay Ratliff to get cap compliant at some point which will lead to a dead money charge of $11 million for two guys who have contributed nothing since being signed to overpriced contracts by the Cowboys owner.

Teams that consistently go “cash over cap” are not going to be able to escape a hard cap. It will always catch up with you. If a team is able to get to the Super Bowl and win that elusive championship maybe the fall wont be as hard but only 1 team can win it and most teams that consistently restructure year after year will likely be disappointed when its time to pay back the cap and they have no rings to show for it.

[adsenseyu1]

Salary Cap Set at 123 Million; Cap Estimates Now Updated…

According to multiple sources the NFL has officially set the salary cap at $123 million, nearly 2 million higher than anticipated. With that in mind I have now updated the salary cap estimates for each team. While I would expect many of the figures to be ballpark accurate they will not be 100% accurate. I do not have the majority of Steelers and Cowboys restructures included in the database. I will wait until the base salary information is official before jumping the gun on many of the deals. So expect them to be updated tomorrow or by Monday at the latest. The salary cap totals include the top 51, estimated dead money, and team by team cap adjustments from last year. The Eagles have the highest adjusted cap at $146,046,035 while the Redskins have the lowest at $109,270,296.Every team will have their number adjusted downward by $504,000 on March 12 to account for minimum workout payments.

The new salary cap limit represents a 1.99% increase over last years salary cap. By my calculations that should not be enough to account for the raise in rookie base salary to allow the rookie pool to result in increased bonus money for the 2013 draft picks. The reason for this is that the rookie pool rises with the salary cap, however this increase does not allow for a low draft pick to receive the same signing bonus as last season and a minimum of $405,000. For example last years 25th pick of the 7th round had a Year One pool number of $402,358, of which $12,358 was bonus money. A 1.99% increase would only bring that Pool number to $410,365 in 2013. Considering the minimum salary a draft pick can earn is $405,000 it would leave the player with a significantly smaller bonus than last years player picked in the same slot. In 2012 to avoid this the league basically just adjusted the year one numbers to account for a $15,000 raise over the prior year. So I would expect the same here making the rookie pool estimates still relatively on target. The undrafted rookie pool will likely be just over $78,100 per team which can be spent on signing bonuses for undrafted players.

Any errors or tips that you see just shoot me an email.

Estimated NFL Cap Space

[adsenseyu1]

Link: Jenny Vrentas on Flat Salary Cap

Jenny Vrentas of the Newark Star Ledger has an excellent article detailing the impact of the new CBA on many veteran players and the thought that teams will be creating flatter salary structures built into the contracts.

Toward the end of the last CBA, there were annual increases in cap,” Jets general manager John Idzik said. “There would be a natural incline in some of those deals, and if you’re not too careful in planning those deals in a relatively flat cap situation, it could back you into a hole.”

The contracts that will be negotiated when free agency opens in March will now likely have flatter salaries from year to year. The goal is to construct realistic deals, Idzik said, where both the player and the team have a practical chance to play it out.

It’s definitely an interesting read and consideration. Under the prior CBA the cap was growing close to $6 million a season. While contracts in the NFL have always been backloaded there were plenty of teams that had players they expected to contribute under mid tier prices with those cap growths in mind. Some deals were restructured and in other cases players cut. I think we have also started to see more teams using pure cash to cap philosophies to better align player costs with the cap and eliminate significant dead money considerations.

I highly recommend reading the full article which is available on nj.com. There are some great quotes from GMs around the league in there regarding the salary cap and its impact on the game.

[adsenseyu1]

Explaining the June 1st Designation

One of the questions I get a lot deals with what a “post June 1cut is and how designating someone a June 1 cut helps my team. So lets talk a bit about that today.

What we are talking about here deals strictly with the acceleration of prorated bonus money onto the current years salary cap. The NFL essentially breaks up its salary cap accounting for bonuses into two periods with June 1 being the trigger date. When a player is removed from a players roster prior to June 1st all his remaining unamortized bonus money immediately accelerates onto the salary cap. To illustrate this we see how the Kansas City Chiefs gave Steve Breaston a $5 million dollar signing bonus in 2011, which was accounted as $1 million in yearly expenses over the course of his 5 year contract. When he was released just the other day he had only completed 2 years of his 5 year contract meaning the Chiefs salary cap had only accounted for $2 million of the $5 million paid in 2011. The balance of $3 million dollars immediately accelerates onto the Chiefs 2013 salary cap.

After June 1 the NFL changes the way the acceleration works.  After June 1st only the current years expense remains on the books after the player is released. The balance accelerates onto the following years salary cap. So in Breastons case had the Chiefs waited until June 1st to release him his salary cap charge in 2013 would have been $1 million and in 2014 he still would be on the books at $2 million dollars.

This rule is really another way in which the league holds tremendous power over the players.  In some cases the acceleration of bonus money could throw a teams salary cap into chaos, if higher than the players current cap charge as an active player. Since teams need to remain under the cap at all times once the League Year begins the potential of the acceleration onto the current years cap would prevent a players release and allow them to continue earning their salary for the year. Instead they are thrust into a pool of summertime free agents when most teams are strapped for cap space and have made many of the decisions about their roster.

I think where many people get confused, though, is when they hear that “player x” could be designated a June 1 cut and immediately jump to conclusions that it means a spending spree in March. The league allows each team to designate up to two players per year as a June 1 cut for cap purposes prior to June 1. It’s the one concession that was given to the players as it allows a player to be cut in March and have time to explore free agency but have his cap hit spread out over two seasons, thus creating more cap space in the current year.   The issue though is the mechanism by which this works.

When you designate someone as a June 1 cut the player and his current contract remain on the books until June 1. Going back to the Breaston example has he been designated a June 1 cut his cap charge today would not be $1 million with $2 million on the books in 2014. His cap charge would be $5 million dollars, the same cap charge as if they never cut him at all. When June 1st hits his cap then moves down to $1 million and the other $2 million accelerate into the 2014 season. By that point in time free agency is finished and the extra cap room does not do the team much good. They would have been in a far better cap position during the important time of free agency by releasing Breaston outright as the Chiefs did.

The real purpose of the June 1 designation option is to benefit teams that have poor salary cap situations and need to either create space for rookie signings over the summer months or to cut players from the roster whose dead money charges are greater than their charge to remain on the team. In recent years this would be teams like the Dallas Cowboys and Oakland Raiders who have entered into some overpriced contracts for multiple players leaving them tight against the cap every season. The acceleration from one of these underperforming players would put the team over the cap or close enough to it to make it difficult to sign the draft class. Often waiting until June 1 is not an option because of offseason bonus money that would be due to the player if he is on the roster so the only option is to designate him a June 1 cut. So the rule gives the team the ability to avoid paying the player a bloated salary while also avoiding more cap problems. But by no means is it going to be a way to spend more money in the early stages of free agency and it does nothing to improve a teams cap position in March.

[adsenseyu1]

A Guide to the NFL Salary Cap

Since writing this way back in 2013 OTC has grown tremendously in terms of readership and has really helped people learn more about the contractual side of the NFL and the saary cap accounting that teams have to follow. This past year I wrote a book that covers everything you would want to know about the NFL CBA, salary cap, and other contractual items. You can click the link below to purchase from Amazon as it will give you a much more in depth look at the salary cap. But for a quick reference you can keep on reading here to learn a little more about the structure of NFL contracts.

One of the things that people often ask me about is how exactly does the salary cap work. I admit sometimes I take it for granted with my charts and explanations that people know how it works when in reality most don’t. I still learn something new when I interact with people as it pertains to the salary cap and I’ve immersed myself in it for the last 6 years or so and done my best to learn as much as I can. So I’ll try and explain some of the money that makes up a contract and yearly cap hit and what exactly happens when a player is cut or traded. This is probably going to be long, but hopefully wont be too confusing, though I make no promises.

Paragraph 5 Salary

The P5 salary is what I refer to as a players base salary. This is the money actually earned for playing during the NFL season. The CBA mandates minimum levels of P5 pay but not maximum levels. Minimum pay is based on your experience in the NFL. Experienced is based on earning a “credited season”, which is defined as more or less being on the active 53 man roster for at least 3 games in a given season. In 2013 the minimum pay for a rookie is $405,000 and for a veteran who has been at least 10 credited seasons its $940,000. The salary itself is earned in 17 weekly installments and does not require participation in a game to be earned. The cutoff deadline for earning a week’s pay is actually Tuesday at 4PM EST, which is why Tuesday during the season is a big day for players to be cut. It avoids an extra weeks financial commitment to a player. In general P5 salary would be similar to what you earn at your job in that if you work you get paid a pre-negotiated amount of money.

When players get injured and the player is put on IR their salaries can reduce to make up for the fact that they are not playing. This is called a split salary. It is very common for players drafted in the last 4 rounds of the draft during their first two or three seasons in the NFL and for veteran players who have an injury history. For stars like Darrelle Revis it is not a factor. So during the season if you look at the IR charts I keep on my website and you see a base salary of $288,000 for a rookie in 2013 its because I am assuming that they have a split in their contract to reduce the financial burden, both cash and cap, to a franchise. A player does not earn a credit towards a season if they are on IR.

Veteran players can also sign what are called “Qualifying Contracts” in which they are paid in cash at the minimum level but their cap charge is only that of a player with two years of experience. This type of contract was created to allow veterans who make more money than younger players to have a chance to remain in the NFL by keeping the cap dollars at the same level. The contract must be no longer than 1 season, contain the minimum salary, a guarantee not to exceed the minimum salary of a player with 2 years experience, and additional bonus money not to exceed $65,000, a number that rises by $15,000 every 3 years with the next raise coming in 2015, in order to qualify. If the player received more than $65,000 from another team that season in offseason bonus money you can not sign than player to a qualifying contract.

Roster/Reporting Bonuses

These are lump sum bonuses paid out for fulfilling specific criteria such as being on the roster or reporting on time to training camp. Roster bonuses come in a number of different forms. Offseason roster bonuses are probably the most prevalent and give the players the most job security. These are the bonuses you hear about on ESPN when they state “Player X has a bonus due on the 2nd day of the 2013 League Year”. What this means is that if a player remains on the roster beyond 4PM of the 2nd day of the League Year (which means the 2nd day of free agency) he earns a lump sum payment that the team can not get back if they cut the player at any other point in the season. Why is this good for a player? Because it forces the teams hand to quickly make a decision on the players future. A players best chance of finding another job and getting the most money is if he is available during all of free agency. If a team carries a player through August and then cuts him, the players chances at getting big money or a new home drastically reduces. Teams at that point are “capped out” and don’t like to fill out a roster with new guys who have yet to know the system.

A perfect example of this was a few years ago when the Arizona Cardinals cut Matt Leinart in early September. The best he could do was obtain a contract for the minimum salary, $630,000, with the Texans and a chance to earn a few more dollars if he ever played. He never saw any action that year and earned $630,000. The following year Houston gave Leinart a two year deal worth $5.5 million dollars and $2 million guaranteed. He never did anything in 2010 to warrant a raise in 2011. It was simply the timing of the whole issue. If he had an offseason roster bonus in his contract with Arizona he would have earned the bigger contract in 2010.

Other forms of the roster bonus come a bit later in free agency. This gives the player ample time to find a new home while also giving the team time to either trade the contract or renegotiate the salary. More team friendly roster bonuses deal with being on the roster during the season. Like salary these are paid out in weekly installments, but come with all kinds of conditions. The most stringent condition is the active gameday 46 man roster. If you don’t dress on gameday you do not get paid. Teams cant do that with the P5 salary which is why this form of roster bonus is popular. Others are rolled into simply being on the 53 man roster per game while the best forms for the player are those that are paid even if the player is on the injured reserve or PUP list. Some of the crazier ones I have heard are bonuses that are earned if the player is on the roster sometime in February of the following year! New England and San Francisco are teams that widely use in-season roster bonuses.

From a cap standpoint there is also a benefit to the in-season roster bonus. In the NFL these are considered incentive based payments. What that means is that when the league year begins what counts towards the salary cap depends on what you did the year before. So if you are set to earn $31,250 for every game on the active 46 but only made the active 46 the prior year for 5 games your cap charge in March will only be $156,250 rather than $500,000. Now if the player ends up playing 16 games they will adjust your cap number accordingly, but that comes at seasons end not during free agency when teams need the cap room. This was one of the reasons why the Jets used that type of structure with LaRon Landry. It allowed them to avoid $875,000 in cap charges for 2012 and defer them to a later date. P5s and normal offseason roster bonuses will always have the full amount count towards the salary cap. Teams like the Jets can use these in-season roster bonuses as ways to skirt the salary cap for one season if they wanted to with players like Santonio Holmes by restructuring his deal to include large roster bonuses for being on the active 53 next year.

Workout Bonus

These are bonuses paid out for completion of a team’s offseason workout program. These programs now run for, I believe, 9 weeks, starting in late March and running through May. Teams can not require mandatory participation for offseason workouts so they often pay large bonuses to entice players to participate. The way these work are as long as you complete a certain percentage of the program you earn the full compensation. Some like Landry don’t bother and forego their bonuses. In addition all players will earn $175 a day for each day they participate in 2013. That per day number changes every other year, with the next increase slated for 2015. The NFL charges each team at the start of the 2013 league year a cap fee of $504,000 for minimum workouts on top of the contracted bonuses, so any reported cap space number between now and the start of free agency needs to be reduced by $504,000. At the end of the workout period teams have their salary cap credited for money that was not earned.

Other Bonuses

These are incentivized bonuses that are only earned for meeting some type of criteria. They can be simple things like weight, which are often given to linemen to avoid them getting too heavy, or very difficult to achieve bonuses like being elected to the All Pro Team. Like those in-season roster bonuses most of these other bonuses are based on performance from the year before. So if you have a $100,000 bonus for making the Pro Bowl in 2013 and you made the Pro Bowl in 2012, the team takes a $100,000 cap charge in 2013 because the bonus is now considered “likely to be earned”(LTBE). If the player does not actually meet the performance at the end of the year the team is credited with the money back on the cap which will then be carried over to the next league year. So whenever you see this money listed on a players cap its actually money not yet earned and money that may never be earned.

The CBA spells out all the criteria necessary for the categories in which individual bonuses may be paid. Again it’s a mechanism teams can use to circumvent the cap if the player was injured the year before. For example you could pay Mike Vick a $1 million dollar bonus for 2400 passing yards or Holmes a large bonus for 25 receptions. While in my mind those are pretty likely numbers, the NFL considers them “not likely to be earned” (NLTBE) in 2013. In general this section of bonuses can get very complex especially when teams begin to tie in bonuses based on individual criteria (say playing time) and team success (offensive ranking in a category) or playoff wins.

Prorated Bonus

I saved this for last because it is the money that seems to cause the most confusion when people look at the cap. For the most part prorated money is what is referred to as a signing bonus in the press. It is essentially a lump sum bonus that is considered paid out when a contract is signed or an option invoked, though in reality the payout occurs over a period of time. Now there are a number of less used prorated bonuses such as completion bonuses, fully guaranteed roster bonuses, bonuses when signed during a season, etc…but for this discussion we just are interested in those basic signing or option bonuses.

For those of us who have ever taken an accounting course think of this money as a depreciation schedule on an asset. If you have no accounting knowledge maybe think of it like buying a car in that your personal expense comes over the 5 years you are paying off the car loan. The league looks at each player as an asset with a maximum working life of 5 years for every prorated bonus paid. Prorated money is split over the course of the contract or 5 years, whichever is less, in equal installments. So if you have a player with a 6 year contract that begins in 2013 and you pay him a signing bonus of $20 million he will carry an expense of $4 million in each year from 2013-2017 from the bonus. There will be no expense in 2018 because that is beyond 5 years. If it’s a 3 year deal with a $9 million bonus the expense is $3 million per year because now the limit is 3 seasons rather than 5.

When you hear of an option bonus normally it means a bonus paid out in the second year of the contract, though sometimes it can be as late as the third or fourth year. That starts the clock over on the working life. So in the case of the 6 year deal an option bonus paid in 2014 will extend all the way out to 2018. So if its a $5 million bonus that’s an extra $1 million per year. The prorated bonus portion of the players salary now includes the $4 million from the first bonus and $1 million from the second bonus, giving him a full charge of $5 million per year from 2014-2017 and $1 million in 2018.

In general what we are talking about here is the ability to “buy now but pay later” from a salary cap perspective. What happens is the team and player agree on a contract value. Lets assume the sides decide he has to earn $21 million in the first 3 years of a 5 year deal worth $33 million total. Now the team could simply pay him $7 million a year in P5 salary, which would leave the team with cap charges of $7 million per year, but what if team is really strapped for cap space. Their other option is to pay him $15 million in a signing bonus, prorated at $3 million per year, and then pay the rest of the $21 million as base salary. Pretend its $1 million in 2013, $2 million in 2014, and $3 million in 2015. Our new cap charges are $4 million, $5 million, and $6 million a huge savings on our team salary cap. This is why you hear of teams, and the Jets will likely be one of them in 2013, converting base salary into a guaranteed bonus. All is well in the world when we do this until we come across what we call “dead money”.

Dead Money

This is the “pay later” portion of the equation. Dead money is your unused prorated money. Going back to the car example- unfortunately you find out that your car is a lemon just three years into owning it. The transmission died. The car leaks every fluid under the sun. Every other week it breaks down on your way to work. You have no option but to junk it. Does the bank just forgive the remaining two years of your auto loan? Nope. If you still owe $7,000 on the car you have to pay the bank $7,000 when you give that car up. That’s exactly what happens in the NFL. In essence you owe the salary cap money like you would the bank.

In the example where we had a 6 year contract with a signing and an option bonus that money you owe the cap is huge if you need to “junk” the player. If you want to cut the player in 2015 it’s a charge of $5 million per year from 2015 thru 2017 and an additional $1 million in 2018. In the NFL you get that money all charged at once so it’s a lump sum payment of $16 million in cap dollars for a player not even on the team. In 2016 its $11 million, 2017 its $6 million and in 2018 it would be $1 million.

That’s why signing bonus money gives the player far more financial security than just the lump sum payment. It offers an extra layer of protection from being cut due to the cap costs being so high to the team. Better to pay the player a few million to stick around and eat up $8 million in cap space than not be here and cost me $16 million. That’s why when we talk about restructuring contracts for the sake of salary cap room in this year we always have to have an eye on the future. Its why for players like David Harris and Nick Mangold who have had two down years in a row you don’t want to push too far in the future. You also need to see what it means for future cap. In Mangold’s case he has a gigantic salary cap number already in 2015. Push too much money from 2013 into the future and you are stuck with no more room to renegotiate in 2015 unless you just want to remain tied to someone that may be trending down. Just getting under the cap is easy, managing the future is not and GMs and cap managers spend tons of time going over those possibilities when they have to use prorated money for salary cap purposes

The only other issue in regards to dead money from the prorated bonus is the timing of the release or trade of the player. It if occurs after June 1 the league will only allow you to take a dead cap hit of the prorated money from that particular season, meaning $5 million in the example above. The balance is then charged to the following year, in the example $11 million in 2016. You can also designate a player a June 1 cut prior to June 1. In this case you will maintain the full cap charge for the player, even though he has been released, until June 1 at which point just the prorated money for the year remains with the balance being charged to the following league year. This is done to allow you to avoid guarantees or roster and workout bonus money that you might be obligated to pay if the player actually remains on the roster until June 1. But in terms of helping with free agency it really does not give you any benefit due to the benefit coming long after players are signed.

Guaranteed Money

In the NFL you can primarily be cut for three reasons: skill, injury, and salary cap. A skill cut states that you are no longer as good as your peers competing for the same position. Injury means that you are not in the necessary condition to play football. Salary cap terminations mean that a team needs cap room to sign a player or retain players who, in the view of the club, are better than you. In the NFL almost anything can be guaranteed (P5 salary, roster bonuses, workout bonuses, etc…), but it’s the level of guarantee that is important.

Fully guaranteed money is the real deal. That means your money is protected from skill, injury, and cap terminations. For you to not earn that money you have to do something egregious to be cut and not paid. The most complete form is that with “no offset” meaning not only do you get paid from the team that cut you but any additional money you earn from another team that year is yours to keep. Most contain offset language meaning if the player has a $7 million dollar guarantee and signs with a new team for $2 million you are only on the hook for $5 million in cap and cash dollars.

Often times reported guarantees are not fully guaranteed. Normally they just contain protection for 1 of the 3 termination reasons. So if you are protected from injury but don’t get hurt that injury guarantee was worth nothing. You have a skill guarantee but the teams cap is awful you are out of luck. You will never see a roster or workout bonus guaranteed for all 3 terminations upon signing, due to rules in the CBA treating them as a prorated bonus. In my mind the skill guarantee is the best of the three to have because it’s the most subjective but that’s just my opinion on it.

Guarantees can also be earned over the life of a contract. Usually its based on being on the roster beyond a certain date- normally either right after the Super Bowl in February or the 2nd day of the new League Year in March. I believe Tom Bradys deal fully guarantees itself every year where he is on the roster at the start of the League Year. Roster and workout bonuses can also become fully guaranteed and not treated as a prorated bonus using similar mechanisms where the full guarantee is contingent on an event. Veteran players who have never received what is called “Termination Pay” automatically have their base salaries guaranteed at the start of a season if they make the active roster for week 1. If they do not make it for week one about ¼ of their salary is guaranteed. One you receive “Termination Pay” this automatic guarantee is no longer available to the player.

The benefit to guaranteed salary for the team is that is lessens the dead money from bonuses in the later years of a contract making it cost effective to cut a player in the 3rd year and beyond of most contracts. It is also a useful tool in negotiations to work out more favorable terms with a player since you are guaranteeing money rather than just protecting it with dead money. Also, unlike signing bonuses, there is no dead money that remains on your team if you trade a player. In a trade in the NFL all signing bonus money accelerates onto the cap of the team trading the player, just like as if the player was cut. The guaranteed salary simply transfers to the new team.

On my site when you see “dead money” listed it includes all prorated money for a player plus money that I know is guaranteed for skill that season. It is the number based on the player being a pre-June 1 cut. If you want to know the amount if cut after June 1 for most players you simply find the players dead money charge for the following season and subtract it from the amount in the current season from the tables. Or you can just email me and Ill follow up with you on it.

Closing Thoughts

Well hopefully you made it to the bottom of this and if you did hopefully it at least explains a little bit of what is in an NFL player contract, how they are valued, and how it effects the possibilities of cutting the player and general workings of the salary cap. Feel free to ask any questions below or via email and Ill try to answer those questions either in a future article or in a followup discussion post as best I can.

[adsenseyu1]

New Feature: Rookie Pool Estimates

I just wanted to draw everyone’s attention to a new feature on the site that you can find on the sidebar to the right where you can view my contract estimates for the upcoming NFL Draft. While none of these numbers will be perfect, and its entirely possible the NFL can change their formulas to meet the specifics of the CBA which will lower the numbers significantly, they hopefully can give you a guide as to what salary cap room your team will need just to sign rookies. If your team already has 51 players under contract the net effect on the cap, for the most part, will be the cap charge minus the salary of the player currently in the top 51 being replaced. A quick way to estimate it is to take the teams Year One Rookie Pool Allocation and subtract the number of picks multiplied by $405,000.

The 2013 Rookie Pool Estimates will give you team by  team totals for the draft class, including this years rookie pool.

The Pick by Pick Cap Estimates will give you the breakdown from pick 1 down to 224 of what the contract and cap charges may look like.

In both links if you click on the name of the team it will take you to your teams rookie class breakdown so you can quickly see the individual breakdowns of your favorite team.

Feel free to email me if you have any questions about the methodology or note errors in any sheets. Once compensatory picks are awarded I will update accordingly.

[adsenseyu1]

An Offseason Look at the Cleveland Browns

For whatever reason there just seems to be no team more non-descript in the NFL than the Cleveland Browns. It just seems that year after year the team is a meaningless franchise. In the last 10 years they have only had one season with more than 6 wins and their last playoff appearance came in 2002. They are now on their third front office reset in the last five years, turning to Mike Lombardi who has been off the field and in the TV studios for the last 5 years to try to save the team.

Cap Positions

You won’t find too many more teams with more cap space than the Browns, which I currently have estimated to be around $45 million in 2013. The have what I believe is the fourth lowest real payroll in the NFL with only $66 million and change being spent on active contracts. So this is not a team that is going to be forced to make any to create cap space. These are simply going to be moves made to get better.

Who might be in trouble in Cleveland?  LB Chris Gocong is coming off surgery and missed the entire 2012 season. He may not fit in with the teams’ new defense and is owed $4.55 million in cash compensation this year. QB Colt McCoy earned a hefty escalator in his contract to bump his salary to $2.325 million, which could be considered a bit pricey for someone just as likely to be the 3rd string QB as a starter. This is the final year of McCoy’s contract so a release post June 1 will not hurt the 2014 salary cap in any matter which would make me believe that he will at least see the summer and get to compete for the job unless another team offers a trade. McCoy has no offseason bonus money due to him.

Notable Free Agents

K Phil Dawson has been given the franchise tag designation two years in a row, which essentially makes him ineligible for another franchise tag in 2013. Per CBA rules a player tagged for the third time has the option of taking a salary equal to the average of the 5 largest salaries at the highest paid position in the league from the prior year, which is always going to be Quarterback. So using the franchise tag on Dawson would be approximately $15.261 million in guaranteed salary. While that would be comical if it happened I am guessing there is no chance it will.

Other free agents include CB Sheldon Brown, KR Josh Cribbs, and TE Ben Watson.

Rookie Pool

The Browns look to have six picks in this years draft. They used their second round pick in the supplemental draft last year and will flop 6th and 7th rounders with the Philadelphia Eagles to complete a trade from last season. My estimate for their year 1 salary is $5,434,322

PickSB2013 Cap2014Cap2015Cap2016CapTotal
Round 16$10,268,736$2,972,184$3,715,230$4,458,276$5,201,322$16,347,012
Round 36$671,252$572,813$692,813$702,813$722,813$2,691,252
Round 47$643,172$565,793$655,793$745,793$835,793$2,803,172
Round 56$201,972$455,493$545,493$635,493$725,493$2,361,972
Round 65$117,932$434,483$524,483$614,483$704,483$2,277,932
Round 67$114,224$433,556$523,556$613,556$703,556$2,274,224
Total$12,017,288$5,434,322$6,657,368$7,770,414$8,893,460$28,755,564

[adsenseyu1]