Categories: Uncategorized

Expected Contract Value Impact of Cap-Driven Restructures

Each offseason a number of players agree to simple restructures of their contracts designed to free up cap room for their respective teams in the present year. These cap-driven restructures involve converting base salary (or roster bonus) to signing bonus, with the converted amount then prorated over the remaining years on the contract (up to a maximum of five years). These restructures only involve changing the nature of contract payments, as opposed to the amount of those payments, and are therefore distinguished from pay cuts, raises or extensions. There is clearly no downside to the player agreeing to do this, as he immediately receives money scheduled for payment more than six months in the future (and which is often not guaranteed). But what may be overlooked is that these cap-driven restructures typically increase expected earnings in future seasons without in any way changing the payment terms in those future season.

When teams evaluate potential cap-driven contract terminations, they cannot focus solely on each player’s cap number. The teams must consider the dead money that would remain after releasing the player, which drives the amount of cap savings that would result from a contract termination. If Player X and Player Y each carry cap number of $10 million, but releasing Player X would create $8 million worth of dead money while releasing Player Y would create only $2 million worth of dead money, then Player Y is more likely to be released, all other things being equal. When a player executes a cap-driven restructure, the prorated bonus amounts that extend into future contract seasons amount to more potential dead money in those future seasons, thereby causing those players to look more like Player X in the above example than Player Y. Because the players who execute contract restructures are therefore less likely to be released in future seasons, their expected earnings increase to account for the higher probability of earning the scheduled contract amounts associated with those future seasons.

The amount of cap savings associated with a contract termination is factored into one of the variables of Expected Contract Value, so we can use ECV to calculate the change in expected earnings resulting from a cap-driven restructure. For each contract season, the probability of remaining under contract is multiplied by the scheduled earnings to calculate the expected earnings. In the charts below I have only depicted the probabilities of remaining under contract and the aggregate impact on expected earnings. Note that the probability of remaining under contract in the final season of a contract never changes as a result of a cap-driven restructure. This is because the increase in dead money is identical to the increase in cap number (as there are no more future seasons for which prorated amounts would accelerate from), so the savings is equal to the base salary (plus roster bonuses, workout bonuses and LTBE incentives) no matter how much dead money would result from a contract termination.

This analysis does not speak to the implications for the teams executing these restructures, but from a player’s perspective this should be taken into consideration when structuring new contracts. If a player has the opportunity to structure the contract in such a way as to potentially force a team to perform one of these restructures, then the player will likely end up with higher earnings than could have been expected at the time of signing. This was the case with the contracts for Suh and Clay in particular, and Josh Norman has positioned himself very well for a 2017 cap-driven restructure with his new contract signed with Washington.

Ndamukong Suh
  Probability of Remaining Under Contract
  Before Restructure After Restructure
2017 92.4% 96.4%
2018 59.2% 71.2%
2019 31.9% 37.9%
2020 20.2% 20.2%
Change in ECV +$3,176,395
 
Cameron Jordan
  Probability of Remaining Under Contract
  Before Restructure After Restructure
2017 91.8% 95.4%
2018 75.7% 82.3%
2019 53.3% 58.3%
2020 35.0% 35.0%
Change in ECV +$1,315,752
 
Charles Clay
  Probability of Remaining Under Contract
  Before Restructure After Restructure
2017 84.9% 95.5%
2018 68.6% 80.8%
2019 45.8% 45.8%
Change in ECV +$1,023,514
 
Jimmy Smith
  Probability of Remaining Under Contract
  Before Restructure After Restructure
2017 78.9% 84.8%
2018 53.8% 58.7%
2019 26.6% 26.6%
Change in ECV +$944,816
Marshal Yanda
  Probability of Remaining Under Contract
  Before Restructure After Restructure
2017 62.9% 71.2%
2018 35.6% 40.0%
2019 17.1% 17.1%
Change in ECV +$804,095
 
Tyron Smith
  Probability of Remaining Under Contract
  Before Restructure After Restructure
2017 94.9% 96.9%
2018 88.6% 91.6%
2019 79.6% 82.2%
2020 70.2% 70.2%
2021 57.6% 57.6%
2022 38.3% 38.3%
2023 27.1% 27.1%
Change in ECV +$745,567
 
Tyrone Crawford
  Probability of Remaining Under Contract
  Before Restructure After Restructure
2017 91.5% 94.5%
2018 83.4% 87.3%
2019 63.0% 66.6%
2020 43.4% 43.4%
Change in ECV +$692,663
 
Thomas Morstead
  Probability of Remaining Under Contract
  Before Restructure After Restructure
2017 69.4% 76.0%
2018 61.9% 61.9%
Change in ECV +$247,863
 
James Carpenter
  Probability of Remaining Under Contract
  Before Restructure After Restructure
2017 74.1% 79.3%
2018 50.2% 50.2%
Change in ECV +$243,585
 
Corey Graham
  Probability of Remaining Under Contract
  Before Restructure After Restructure
2017 21.0% 21.0%
Change in ECV
 

Expected Contract Value was created by Bryce Johnston and Nick Barton.

Bryce Johnston earned his Juris Doctor from Georgetown University Law Center in May 2014, and currently works as a corporate M&A associate in the New York City office of an AmLaw 50 law firm.  Before becoming a contributor to overthecap.com, Bryce operated eaglescap.com for 10 NFL offseasons, appearing multiple times on 610 WIP Sports Radio in Philadelphia as an NFL salary cap expert. Bryce can be contacted via e-mail at bryce.l.johnston@gmail.com or via Twitter @NFLCapAnalytics.

Nick Barton is  a junior at the McDonough School Business at  Georgetown University.  He is majoring in Finance and Operations and Information Management. Nick currently interns with an NFL team . His prior work experience includes interning with CollegeSplits and Dynamic Sports Solutions, and working as a research assistant for the Center of Applied Research of the Apostolate.

Share
Published by
Bryce Johnston

Recent Posts

The Salary Cap Costs and Value Added from the 2024 NFL Draft

With the 2024 NFL Draft in the books we now have a final estimate for…

2 days ago

Valuing the 2nd Round Trades of the 2024 NFL Draft

With the second round of the 2024 draft in the books I wanted to go…

3 days ago

Valuing the 1st Round Trades in the 2024 NFL Draft

With the first round of the 2024 draft in the books I wanted to go…

4 days ago

Premium Content: NFL Draft Summary Data

For those who are premium subscribers I put together a pdf file breaking down the…

5 days ago

2024 Projected UDFA Class Sizes

With only a few days before the 2024 NFL Draft, it's that time again to…

1 week ago

NFL Drafting Strategies

Every year as the draft approaches I like to look at different trends over the…

1 week ago