This week, I’m going to revisit the 2016 signings and note where each player stands after 8 weeks on their new contracts.
Methodology
See my prior article here for more information regarding how these tiers were constructed and what types of tight ends fit into each tier.
APY | Catches/16 | Targets/16 | Catch % | Yards/16 | TDs/16 | |
Tier 1 | $9M+ | 80 | 120 | 66% | 1,000 | 11 |
Tier 2 | $6.5M-$9M | 75 | 110 | 68% | 800 | 5 |
Tier 3 | $4M-$6.5M | 55 | 85 | 63% | 500 | 4 |
Tier 4 | <$4M | n/a – Veteran Backup/Blocking Tight End |
Results through 2016 Week 8
16 Game Pace | ||||||||
Tier 1 Contracts | Current APY | Games Played | Catches | Targets | Catch % | Yards | TDs | APY Value |
Expectation | $9M+ | 80 | 120 | 66% | 1,000 | 11 | ||
Travis Kelce | $9.37M | 7 of 7 | 78 | 103 | 76% | 862 | 7 | High Tier 2 |
Jordan Reed | $9.35M | 6 of 8 | 112 | 157 | 71% | 1,107 | 8 | Tier 1 |
Travis Kelce: Kelce’s production so far in 2016 is very similar to his results of the prior two seasons. He is on pace for essentially identical yards to go along with two additional touchdowns and a handful of additional catches. Kansas City shouldn’t be too disappointed as Kelce hasn’t regressed below his prior production, but he also has disappeared for entire games. In 4 out of 7 games played this year, Kelce did not exceed 35 yards. While his overall production is just a bit below expectation based on his APY, Kansas City should be expecting much more consistency.
Jordan Reed: Jordan Reed has had issues staying healthy for a complete season so far in his career and that trend has continued in 2016. When he has been on the field, he has performed up to the level of his contract. Over the past three games alone, he has averaged 9 catches for 75 yards and a touchdown. When considering that he is only participating in 75% of this team’s games, he is really only on pace for a 84/830/6 season. Those totals would still indicate that Reed is providing Washington with a reasonable value.
16 Game Pace | ||||||||
Tier 2 Contracts | Current APY | Games Played | Catches | Targets | Catch % | Yards | TDs | APY Value |
Expectation | $6.5M-$9M | 75 | 110 | 68% | 800 | 5 | ||
Zach Ertz | $8.5M | 5 of 7 | 48 | 64 | 75% | 480 | 0 | Tier 4 |
Dwayne Allen | $7.35M | 6 of 8 | 48 | 72 | 67% | 512 | 5 | Tier 3 |
Coby Fleener | $7.2M | 7 of 7 | 57 | 94 | 61% | 725 | 5 | Low Tier 2/High Tier 3 |
Delanie Walker | $6.7M | 7 of 8 | 64 | 96 | 67% | 926 | 7 | Tier 2 |
Zach Ertz: Ertz is currently performing at a veteran minimum salary level on an $8.5M APY contract. In the past four games, he has totaled 9 catches for 92 yards and no touchdowns. Regardless of what Ertz brings as a blocker, the Eagles are getting a poor return.
Dwayne Allen: Allen’s production has not improved over the past few weeks. Allen does bring additional value as a blocker, but he should be generating around 50% more than he has so far in terms of receiving yardage and touchdowns. Allen’s best game in 2016 was either week 1 or week 5 when he either had 4 catches for 53 yards and a touchdown or 6 catches for 50 yards and a touchdown. Neither one of those should be the high mark for a player on a $7M+ APY contract.
Coby Fleener: Fleener is giving the Saints very uneven production so far. In games against the Falcons and Panthers, he performed very well, averaging 7 catches for 91 yards and a touchdown. In his other games, Fleener did not exceed 4 catches or 44 yards and has not scored. That level of inconsistency is more in line with a player on a $5M APY contract than Fleener’s current $7.2M contract.
Delanie Walker: Walker’s production is pretty close to what should be expected, possibly a bit higher than expected. His catch totals are a bit low, but his yardage and touchdowns make up for it. This continues to be a very good contract for the Titans.
16 Game Pace | ||||||||
Tier 3 Contracts | Current APY | Games Played | Catches | Targets | Catch % | Yards | TDs | APY Value |
Expectation | $4M-$6.5M | 55 | 85 | 63% | 500 | 4 | ||
Jordan Cameron | $6M | 3 of 7 | 43 | 59 | 73% | 320 | 5 | Low Tier 3 |
Antonio Gates | $5.5M | 6 of 8 | 56 | 104 | 54% | 405 | 8 | Tier 3 |
Ladarius Green | $5M | 0 of 7 | n/a – Injured | |||||
Brent Celek | $4M | 7 of 7 | 11 | 18 | 63% | 181 | 0 | Tier 4 |
Marcedes Lewis | $4M | 7 of 7 | 30 | 46 | 65% | 299 | 2 | Tier 4 |
Jordan Cameron: Cameron’s three games prorated over 16 would indicate a player on at best a $4M APY contract. Give that Cameron is missing over half of the Dolphins’ games, Miami would be better off spending those cap dollars pretty much anywhere else. Cameron’s 8 catches for 60 yards and a touchdown on the season should be one good game, not a half season’s worth of work.
Brent Celek: If Celek were producing to the level of his past two seasons, he would be worth around $4M APY given his blocking abilities and his knowledge of the system. Given that he has been primarily a blocking tight end (only 8 targets in 7 games), Celek’s contract should be well below his current $4M APY.
Marcedes Lewis: Lewis is in the same position as Celek. It has been over three seasons (2012) since Lewis has totaled more than 360 receiving yards or 5 touchdowns. He is on pace to fall well short of those low expectations.
16 Game Pace | ||||||||
Tier 4 Contracts | Current APY | Games Played | Catches | Targets | Catch % | Yards | TDs | APY Value |
Zach Miller | $2.75M | 7 of 8 | 75 | 101 | 75% | 697 | 7 | Tier 2/3 |
Jack Doyle | $1.67 | 8 of 8 | 62 | 72 | 86% | 636 | 8 | Tier 2/3 |
There are too many Tier 4 contracts signed in 2016 to list here. The chart above shows two players that are producing above their APY expectation.
Zach Miller: Given Miller’s target volume, catch rate, and touchdown totals, he is performing at a Tier 2 level on a Tier 4 contract. The only statistic that indicates a slightly lower performance level is his yardage. Even considering the low yardage, Miller is performing at least on the level that would be expected from a $6.5M APY player, so the Bears are getting a great value.
Jack Doyle: Doyle has already set career highs in targets, catches, yards, and touchdowns. While he has been a bit inconsistent – he has two games that total 14 yards on 3 catches, Doyle’s performance so far is more in line with a player on a $6.5M APY contract. If Doyle is unable to play in the Colts’ final 8 games, he will have already provided the team with a good investment on his $1.67M APY contract. Doyle’s catch rate in every game this season is at least 66%.